Menor síndrome adyacente superior y menor tasa de reoperación. Resultados a mediano y largo plazo de la artroplastia cervical frente a la artrodesis cervical anterior: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados / Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Objetivo: Comparar a mediano y largo plazo los resultados quirúrgicos postoperatorios, sobre todo la tasa del síndrome adyacente, tasa de eventos adversos y tasa de reoperación, de los pacientes operados con artroplastia cervical o artrodesis cervical anterior en los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) publicados de un nivel cervical. Métodos: Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Se seleccionaron 13 ECA. Se analizaron los resultados clínicos, radiológicos y quirúrgicos, tomando como variables primarias la tasa del síndrome adyacente, tasa de eventos adversos y tasa de reoperación. Resultados: Fueron 2.963 los pacientes analizados. El grupo de artroplastia cervical mostró una menor tasa de síndrome adyacente superior (p<0,001), menor tasa de reoperación (p<0,001), menor dolor radicular (p=0,002) y una mejor puntuación en el índice de discapacidad cervical (p=0,02) y en el componente físico SF-36 (p=0,01). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la tasa del síndrome adyacente inferior, tasa de eventos adversos, dolor cervical ni componente mental SF-36. Se halló en la artroplastia cervical un rango de movilidad medio de 7,91 grados en el seguimiento final y una tasa de osificación heterotópica de 9,67%. Conclusión: En el seguimiento a mediano y largo plazo, la artroplastia cervical mostró menor tasa de síndrome adyacente superior y menor tasa de reintervención. No se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la tasa del síndrome adyacente inferior ni en la tasa de eventos adversos.(AU)

Objective: To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study. Results: Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91 degrees was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty. Conclusion: In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.(AU)

[Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials / Menor síndrome adyacente superior y menor tasa de reoperación. Resultados a mediano y a largo plazo de la artroplastia cervical frente a la artrodesis cervical anterior: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados

Objetivo: Comparar a mediano y largo plazo los resultados quirúrgicos postoperatorios, sobre todo la tasa del síndrome adyacente, tasa de eventos adversos y tasa de reoperación, de los pacientes operados con artroplastia cervical o artrodesis cervical anterior en los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) publicados de un nivel cervical. Métodos: Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Se seleccionaron 13 ECA. Se analizaron los resultados clínicos, radiológicos y quirúrgicos, tomando como variables primarias la tasa del síndrome adyacente, tasa de eventos adversos y tasa de reoperación. Resultados: Fueron 2.963 los pacientes analizados. El grupo de artroplastia cervical mostró una menor tasa de síndrome adyacente superior (p<0,001), menor tasa de reoperación (p<0,001), menor dolor radicular (p=0,002) y una mejor puntuación en el índice de discapacidad cervical (p=0,02) y en el componente físico SF-36 (p=0,01). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la tasa del síndrome adyacente inferior, tasa de eventos adversos, dolor cervical ni componente mental SF-36. Se halló en la artroplastia cervical un rango de movilidad medio de 7,91 grados en el seguimiento final y una tasa de osificación heterotópica de 9,67%. Conclusión: En el seguimiento a mediano y largo plazo, la artroplastia cervical mostró menor tasa de síndrome adyacente superior y menor tasa de reintervención. No se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la tasa del síndrome adyacente inferior ni en la tasa de eventos adversos.(AU)

Objective: To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study. Results: Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91 degrees was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty. Conclusion: In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.(AU)

Medicina de precisión: «Point of Care Ultrasound» (PoCUS) en el abordaje diagnóstico del paciente con hiponatremia / Precision medicine: “Point of Care Ultrasound” (PoCUS) in the diagnostic approach to the patient with hyponatremia

La hiponatremia es un trastorno multifactorial definido como una disminución en la concentración plasmática de sodio. Su diagnóstico diferencial requiere una evaluación adecuada del volumen extracelular. Sin embargo, la determinación del volumen extracelular, simplemente basada en la historia clínica, las constantes vitales, el examen físico y los hallazgos de laboratorio, conducen en ocasiones a un diagnóstico erróneo por lo que el enfoque terapéutico puede ser equivocado. El empleo de ecografía a pie de cama (Point-of-Care Ultrasound [PoCUS]), mediante la combinación de ecografía pulmonar (Lung Ultrasound [LUS]), Venous Excess UltraSound (VExUS) y la ecocardioscopia (Focused Cardiac Ultrasound [FoCUS]) permiten, en combinación con el resto de los parámetros, una valoración holística mucho más precisa del estado del volumen extracelular del paciente.(AU)

Hyponatremia is a multifactorial disorder defined as a decrease in plasma sodium concentration. Its differential diagnosis requires an adequate evaluation of the extracellular volume. However, extracellular volume determination, simply based on the clinical history, vital signs, physical examination, and laboratory findings can leads to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. The use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS), through the combination of Lung Ultrasound (LUS), Venous Excess UltraSound (VExUS) and Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS), allows a much more accurate holistic assessment of the patient's extracellular volume status in combination with the other parameters.(AU)

Fibrilación auricular no valvular en pacientes en diálisis peritoneal: prevalencia, tratamiento y profesionales implicados / Non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients on peritoneal dialysis: prevalence, treatment and professionals involved

La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia crónica más frecuente en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC). La anticoagulación oral con antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) y actualmente los anticoagulantes orales de acción directa (ACOD) han sido el pilar fundamental para la prevención de eventos tromboembólicos. Sin embargo, no existen ensayos clínicos aleatorizados de su perfil riesgo-beneficio en pacientes con ERC estadio 5 en diálisis peritoneal (DP) y son pocas las evidencias en la literatura sobre esta población. El objetivo del estudio fue conocer la prevalencia, tratamiento y profesionales implicados en el manejo de la FA en DP en nuestro entorno mediante el análisis descriptivo de una encuesta enviada a diferentes unidades de DP de España. Se incluyeron en el estudio 1.403 pacientes en programa de DP, de los cuales 186 (13,2%) presentaban FA no valvular (FANV). Además, observamos que la valoración de los scores para el inicio del tratamiento anticoagulante la realizaba mayoritariamente el cardiólogo (60% de los centros), así como la prescripción de anticoagulación (cardiólogo 47% o en conjunto con el nefrólogo 43%). En conclusión, los pacientes en DP presentan una notable prevalencia de FANV. Reciben frecuentemente anticoagulación oral (ACO) con AVK, así como con ACOD. Los datos obtenidos respecto a las escalas utilizadas para la valoración de riesgo tromboembólico y de sangrado, tratamiento e implicación por parte de Nefrología indican que existe una necesidad de formación e involucramiento del nefrólogo en esta patología.(AU)

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent chronic arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and now direct oral anticoagulants have been and are the fundamental pillar for the prevention of thromboembolic events. However, there are no randomized clinical trials on the risk-benefit profile of oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on peritoneal dialysis and there is little evidence in the literature in this population. The objective of our study was to know the prevalence, treatment and professionals involved in the management of atrial fibrillation in peritoneal dialysis patients. For this purpose, we performed a descriptive analysis through a survey sent to different peritoneal dialysis units in Spain. A total of 1403 patients on peritoneal dialysis were included in the study, of whom 186 (13.2%) had non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, the assessment of the scores of thromboembolic and bleeding risks for the indication of oral anticoagulation was mainly carried out by the cardiologist (60% of the units), as well as its prescription (cardiologist 47% in consensus with the nephrologist 43%). In summary, patients on peritoneal dialysis have a remarkable prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients frequently receive oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists, as well as direct oral anticoagulants. The data obtained regarding the scales used for the assessment of thromboembolic and bleeding risk, treatment and involvement by Nephrology indicates that there is a need for training and involvement of the nephrologist in this pathology.(AU)

A comparison of the prevalence of dry mouth and other symptoms using two different versions of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System on an inpatient palliative care unit.

BACKGROUND: Symptom assessment is key to effective symptom management and palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Symptom prevalence and severity estimates vary widely, possibly dependent on the assessment tool used. Are symptoms specifically asked about or must the patients add them as additional symptoms? This study compared the prevalence and severity of patient-reported symptoms in two different versions of a multi-symptom assessment tool. In one version, three symptoms dry mouth, constipation, sleep problems were among those systematically assessed, while in the other, these symptoms had to be added as an "Other problem". METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included adult patients with advanced cancer at an inpatient palliative care unit. Data were collected from two versions of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): modified (ESAS-m) listed 11 symptoms and revised (ESAS-r) listed 9 and allowed patients to add one "Other problem". Seven similar symptoms were listed in both versions. RESULTS: In 2013, 184 patients completed ESAS-m, and in 2017, 156 completed ESAS-r. Prevalence and severity of symptoms listed in both versions did not differ. In ESAS-m, 83% reported dry mouth, 73% constipation, and 71% sleep problems, but on ESAS-r, these symptoms were reported by only 3%, 15% and < 1%, respectively. Although ESAS-r severity scores for these three symptoms were higher than on ESAS-m, differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: We identified significant differences in patient symptom reporting based on whether symptoms like dry mouth, obstipation and sleep problems were specifically assessed or had to be added by patients as an "Other problem".

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool to assess symptom burden in decompensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: While there is a growing need for interventions addressing symptom burden in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC), the lack of validated symptom assessment tools is a critical barrier. We investigated the psychometric properties of the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) in a longitudinal cohort of patients with DC. METHODS: Adult outpatients with DC were prospectively recruited from a liver transplant center and completed ESAS-r at baseline and week 12. We examined reliability, floor/ceiling effects, structural validity, and known-groups validity. We examined the convergent and predictive validity of ESAS-r with health-related quality of life using the Short Form Liver Disease Quality of Life (SF-LDQOL) and responsiveness to changes in anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: From August 2018 to September 2022, 218 patients (9% Child-Pugh A, 59% Child-Pugh B, and 32% Child-Pugh C) were prospectively recruited and completed the ESAS-r, SF-LDQOL, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at baseline and week 12 (n = 135). ESAS-r had strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.86), structural validity (comparative fit index 0.95), known-groups validity (Child-Pugh A: 25.1 vs. B: 37.5 vs. C: 41.4, p = 0.006), and convergent validity (r = -0.67 with SF-LDQOL). Floor effects were 9% and ceiling effects were 0.5%. Changes in ESAS-r scores from baseline to week 12 significantly predicted changes in SF-LDQOL (ß = -0.36, p < 0.001), accounting for 30% of the variation. ESAS-r was strongly responsive to clinically meaningful changes in SF-LDQOL, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSIONS: ESAS-r is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for assessing symptom burden in patients with DC and can predict changes in health-related quality of life. Future directions include its implementation as a key outcome measure in cirrhosis care and clinical trials.

Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC 'Write In three Symptoms/Problems' (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of open-ended questions supplementing static questionnaires with closed questions may facilitate the recognition of symptoms and toxicities. The open-ended 'Write In three Symptoms/Problems (WISP)' instrument permits patients to report additional symptoms/problems not covered by selected EORTC questionnaires. We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of WISP with cancer patients receiving active and palliative care/treatment in Austria, Chile, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom. METHODS: We conducted a literature search on validated instruments for cancer patients including open-ended questions and analyzing their responses. WISP was translated into eight languages and pilot tested. WISP translations were pre-tested together with EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-C15-PAL and relevant modules, followed by patient interviews to evaluate their understanding about WISP. Proportions were used to summarize patient responses obtained from interviews and WISP. RESULTS: From the seven instruments identified in the literature, only the free text collected from the PRO-CTAE has been analyzed previously. In our study, 161 cancer patients participated in the pre-testing and interviews (50% in active treatment). Qualitative interviews showed high acceptability of WISP. Among the 295 symptoms/problems reported using WISP, skin problems, sore mouth and bleeding were more prevalent in patients in active treatment, whereas numbness/tingling, dry mouth and existential problems were more prevalent in patients in palliative care/treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC WISP instrument was found to be acceptable and useful for symptom assessment in cancer patients. WISP improves the identification of symptoms/problems not assessed by cancer-generic questionnaires and therefore, we recommend its use alongside the EORTC questionnaires.

The Effect of the Neuman Systems Model-Based Training and Follow-up on Self-Efficacy and Symptom Control in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.

In this article, the authors aimed to determine the effect of the training and follow-up based on the Neuman systems model provided to patients undergoing chemotherapy on their self-efficacy and symptom control. The study was carried out with a randomized controlled experimental study model design. The sample consisted of 102 patients including 52 in the experimental group and 50 in the control group. The data were collected using the Patient Information Form, the Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief (CBI-B), and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). A personal training program prepared according to the Neuman systems model was applied to the experimental group patients. In the intergroup comparison of the experimental and control group patients, there was an increase in the posttest CBI-B scores and a decrease in the ESAS scores in the experimental group compared to the control group, and the intergroup difference was statistically significant (p < .05). According to the results, to improve the self-efficacy and symptom control in patients undergoing chemotherapy, using this education and follow-up program is recommended.

Impacto del momento de medición y de la sintomatología acontecida durante la hemodiálisis en la Calidad de Vida percibida por el paciente / Impact of measurement timing and symptomatology during hemodialysis on perceived quality of life by the patient

Objetivo: Determinar la relación entre calidad de vida percibida por el paciente en hemodiálisis, el momento de medición de esta y el número de síntomas/complicaciones acontecidos durante la sesión.Material y Método: Estudio observacional longitudinal en pacientes en hemodiálisis con capacidad cognitiva conservada. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, así como calidad de vida mediante instrumento Coop-Wonka.El estudio se desarrolló en 2 fases:Primera fase: evaluación calidad de vida preHD, cuestionario autoadministrado (en las 12 h previas a 1ª sesión semanal).Segunda fase: 4 semanas más tarde, cumplimentación del mismo cuestionario de calidad de vida, administrado por enfermería (al finalizar 1ª sesión semanal).Durante cuatro semanas se recogieron todos los síntomas, complicaciones mecánicas y situaciones de estrés experimentadas por el paciente durante las sesiones.Resultados: Se estudiaron 61 pacientes, 39 hombres (64%). Edad 67,7±13 años. Tiempo en hemodiálisis 68,7±79 meses. Las puntuaciones globales de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud fueron 25,6±6,9 puntos (1ª fase) y 24,2±7 puntos (2ª fase), con diferencias significativas entre ambos periodos. Se registraron 328 síntomas (0,44±0,54/paciente y sesión).El tiempo en hemodiálisis se relacionó con sintomatología y calidad de vida, presesión y post-sesión.Y la sintomatología se relacionó con calidad de vida relacionada con la salud pre y post-sesión.Conclusiones: A mayor tiempo en hemodiálisis los pacientes presentan peor calidad de vida y más sintomatología durante las sesiones. La percepción sobre su estado de salud, es mejor post-sesión en comparación con la percibida antes de la sesión de diálisis. (AU)

Objective: To determine the relationship between patients’ perceived quality of life on hemodialysis, the timing of its measurement, and the number of symptoms/complications occurring during the session.Material and Method: Longitudinal observational study in hemodialysis patients with preserved cognitive capacity. Sociodemographic and clinical variables and quality of life were collected using the Coop-Wonka instrument. The study was conducted in 2 phases:First phase: pre-HD quality of life evaluation, self-administered questionnaire (12 hours before the 1st weekly session).Second phase: 4 weeks later, completion of the same quality of life questionnaire, administered by nursing staff at the end of the 1st weekly session. All symptoms, mechanical complications, and stress situations experienced by the patient during the sessions were recorded for four weeks.Results: Sixty-one patients were studied, 39 men (64%). The mean age was 67.7±13 years. Time on hemodialysis was 68.7±79 months. Overall scores for health-related quality of life were 25.6±6.9 points (1st phase) and 24.2±7 points (2nd phase), with significant differences between both periods. 328 symptoms were recorded (0.44±0.54/patient and session). Time on hemodialysis was related to symptomatology and quality of life, pre-session and post-session. Symptoma-tology was related to health-related quality of life pre and post-session.Conclusions: Patients who have been on hemodialysis for more extended periods have worse quality of life and more symptoms during the sessions. Their perception of their health status is better post-session compared to pre-dialysis sessions. (AU)

The Mediator Role of Illness Representations in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Preliminary Study / [El papel mediador de las representaciones de la enfermedad en pacientes de apnea obstructiva del sueño: un estudio preliminar]

Background: This preliminary study examined the mediating role of illness representations on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between adherent and poorly adherent obstructive sleep apnea patients (OSA) to the automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) therapy. Method: A total of 185 patients were assessed on determinants of APAP treatment, illness representations, family coping, and self-efficacy, at T1 (prior to APAP treatment) and T2 (1 to 2 months with APAP treatment). Results: Regarding the determinants of APAP, adherent patients showed higher self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and decisional balance index, compared to poorly adherent patients. Adherent patients also showed higher family coping and HRQoL, but less threatening cognitive representations compared to poorly adherent patients. Illness cognitive and emotional representations mediated the relationship between self-efficacy/family coping and HRQoL, in adherent patients. Only illness cognitive representations mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and HRQoL in poorly adherent patients. Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of illness representations during OSA treatment in the promotion of adherence to APAP.(AU)

Antecedentes: Este estudio preliminar examina el papel mediador de la representación de la enfermedad en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) entre pacientes con apnea obstructiva del sueño (AOS) observantes y poco observantes de la terapia de presión positiva automática en las vías respiratorias (APAP). Método: Se evaluó a un total de 185 pacientes sobre los determinantes del tratamiento APAP, las representaciones de la enfermedad, el afrontamiento familiar y la autoeficacia en T1 (antes del tratamiento APAP) y T2 (1 a 2 meses con tratamiento APAP). Resultados: En cuanto a los determinantes de la APAP, los observantes mostraron mayor autoeficacia, expectativas de resultados e índice de equilibrio decisional en comparación con los poco observantes. Los observantes también mostraron un mayor afrontamiento familiar y CVRS pero menos representaciones cognitivas amenazantes en comparación con los observantes deficientes. Las representaciones cognitivas y emocionales de la enfermedad mediaron la relación entre la autoeficacia/afrontamiento familiar y la CVRS en pacientes observantes. Solo las representaciones cognitivas de enfermedad mediaron la relación entre la autoeficacia y la CVRS en pacientes de baja observancia. Conclusiones: Los resultados destacan la importancia de las representaciones de la enfermedad durante el tratamiento de la AOS en la promoción de la adherencia a la APAP.(AU)

Cefalea e hipertensión como forma de presentación de un feocromocitoma y simulando un síndrome post-COVID-19 / Headache and hypertension as a form of presentation of pheochromocytoma and simulating a post-COVID-19 syndrome

El síndrome post-COVID-19 es un conjunto de síntomas y signos que persisten durante más de 12 semanas después de una infección por COVID-19 y actualmente carece de una definición clínica estandarizada. Únicamente se ha informado un caso en el que un feocromocitoma se confundió con un síndrome post-COVID-19. La sintomatología de este síndrome es variable y abarca desde la cefalea y la fatiga hasta la disnea persistente y las alteraciones neurocognitivas. Además, el SARS-CoV-2 puede afectar al sistema nervioso autónomo, contribuyendo a síntomas que se asemejan a los del feocromocitoma. Se recalca la importancia y la necesidad de discernir entre síntomas relacionados con la COVID-19 y otras afecciones, ya que la especificidad de las manifestaciones clínicas del síndrome post-COVID-19 es muy baja y puede ser confundido con otras enfermedades vitales. Se presenta un caso en el que un feocromocitoma fue confundido con un síndrome post-COVID-19 en una paciente sin antecedentes médicos.(AU)

Post-COVID-19 syndrome is a set of symptoms and signs that persist for more than 12 weeks after COVID-19 infection and currently lacks a standardised clinical definition. Only one case has been reported in which a pheochromocytoma was mistaken for post-COVID-19 syndrome. The symptomatology of this syndrome is variable and ranges from headache and fatigue to persistent dyspnoea and neurocognitive disturbances. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 can affect the autonomic nervous system, contributing to symptoms resembling those of pheochromocytoma. The importance and need to discern between COVID-19-related symptoms and other conditions is emphasised, as the specificity of the clinical manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome is very low and can be confused with other vital pathologies. A case is presented in which a pheochromocytoma was mistaken for post-COVID-19 syndrome in a patient with no medical history.(AU)

SMART-ESAS: Smartphone Monitoring and Assessment in Real Time of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Scores for Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: Serial patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in clinical practice are associated with a better quality of life and survival. Recording electronic PROs using smartphones is an efficient way to implement this. We aimed to assess the feasibility of the electronically filled Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (e-ESAS) scale in the lower-middle-income country (LMIC) setting. METHODS: Baseline clinical features and conventional paper-based ESAS (p-ESAS) were collected in newly diagnosed patients with solid organ tumors. Text message link was sent to these patients for filling e-ESAS. ESAS was categorized into physical, psychological, and total symptom domains. Scores were divided into none to mild (0-3) and moderate to severe (4-10). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine the correlation between p-ESAS and e-ESAS. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent factors affecting symptom burden. RESULTS: Of 1,160 participants who filled out p-ESAS, 595 completed both e-ESAS and p-ESAS questionnaires and were included in the final analysis. Moderate to severe physical, psychological, and total symptom scores were seen in 39.8%, 40%, and 39% of participants. Tiredness and anxiety were the most common physical and psychological symptoms, respectively. ICCs between the p-ESAS and e-ESAS varied between 0.75 and 0.9. Total symptom scores were independently predicted by metastatic disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.67; P = .001) and a higher level of education (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.72; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Paper-based and electronically filled ESASs have good intraobserver reliability across individual symptoms and domain scores in a representative cohort at a tertiary care institute in the LMIC. This may help us incorporate e-ESAS in routine clinical care in the real-world setting with financial, infrastructural, and manpower limitations.

Development and validation of the Convalescence Symptom Assessment Scale for EsophageCtomy patients.

AIM: A specific, valid and reliable measure is much needed to dynamically assess the recovery of symptoms in oesophagectomy patients. This study describes developing and validating the Convalescent Symptom Assessment Scale for oesophagectomy patients (CSAS_EC). DESIGN: An instrument development and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. METHODS: This study consists of two components: instrument development and psychometric tests. In instrument development, the literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi method expert consultation and face validation were used to develop and refine scale content. In psychometric tests, the clinical test version scale was used to conduct a cross-sectional in the thoracic surgery department from 17 June to 20 November 2022. The Classical Test Theory and Multidimensional Item Response Theory (MIRT) analyses examined psychometric properties. RESULTS: In instrument development, literature review (n = 20), qualitative interviews (n = 21), expert consultation (n = 12) and pre-survey (n = 15) led to the development of the clinical test version scale. In psychometric tests, a total of 331 participants were enrolled. Confirmatory factor analysis and MIRT analysis verified that a model with 28 items in four dimensions was good. The four dimensions were early recovery symptoms, late recovery symptoms, persistent present symptoms and psychosocial symptoms. The Cronbach's α is 0.827. The validity and reliability were demonstrated to be acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The CSAS_EC scale can be used as a tool to evaluate the recovery status of oesophagectomy patients.